I am confused by
Baddeley’s Model of Working Memory. It accounts for visual and auditory
information, as well as information from the long-term memory. I do not see
where other information, such as olfactory or tactile, fit into this model.
Does this mean that these types of information are not a part of the working
memory?
One implication
for teachers of the information processing theory is that we should break down
complex ideas into smaller parts. This can be done by a process called task
analysis. Breaking down big ideas will make it more manageable to take in and
encode relevant information.
Though we know so
much about remembering, we still often forget information. This generally
happens for one of three reasons. The first reason is that information was
never really encoded, and therefore never actually reached the long-term
memory. It is also a possibility that the memory has decayed, or faded. The
last common reason that something is forgotten is retrieval failure, when
information is unable to be found in the memory, although it was learned.
All the sensory information is definitely a part of the model (as we'll consider it). If we define working memory as conscious thought, then I guess the question is whether olfactory information is something that CAN be consciously processed. If yes, then yes, for our purposes, it can be a part of working memory. If you're thinking about the smell of flowers, are you consciously thinking about the smell, or are you thinking in words (oh, that's nice, and reminds me of....) or really thinking about memories you have of similar flower smells.... Very interesting question!
ReplyDelete