The Social Cognitive Theory is
based on the assumption that learning takes place through observation. For
learning to happen, a model performs a specific behavior and a learner observes
the behavior and imitates that behavior. This is how learning happens. There
are factors, however that effect if the learning will happen or not. The first
is the characteristics of a model. A learner is more likely to follow a model
that they look up to. They behavior must be relevant to the learner and the
model must be successful at the behavior. Many times gender also plays a role.
Similarly,
the imitator’s characteristics play a factor on if the behavior is learned. The
learner must pay attention to the behavior, remember and be capable of
performing, and have motivation to do it. The environment can also reinforce or
punish behaviors and change the likelihood of them occurring. Personal factors
include self-regulation and self-efficacy, which deal with a person’s self
control and confidence in their own ability.
One implication for teaching
according to Social Cognitive Theory is that a teacher’s efficacy will have an
affect on what they teach. A teacher must have a high teacher efficacy, or
confidence in their ability to teach and manage a classroom. This influences
student’s efficacy and affects their achievements.
Sociocultural Theory is based on
the fact that all learners learn through socialization. Knowledge occurs
through lived practices of the people in a society, according to the reading.
This theory says that the fact that we are social is central to learning. Knowledge
is just our ability to pursue social enterprises (or things the society values).
I was confused about the three
interacting dimensions of the Sociocultural Theory; they are mutual engagement,
a joint enterprise, and a shared repertoire. Could someone clarify what exactly
these things are?
Other people affect the way I learn
in many ways. Sometimes others challenge me, trying to do as well as them or
keep up with them. Other times I learn from them. Hearing about their
experiences can give me knowledge I would otherwise never have known. I think
it affects what counts as learning or intelligence because everyone has his or
her own definition of what learning, knowledge, and intelligence are. Some people
may consider you wise if you know a lot of information, while others may
consider you wise if you are able to communicate with people well. Knowledge is
a matter of opinion based on society; therefore, society can affect what we
think of as knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment