Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Vygotsky Blog Post 1 - Module 21


Module 21 discusses groups, and the different types and ways to divide children into them. There are two types, heterogeneous and homogeneous, where the first one is a mix of children by the term they are being divided on (such as ability) and the second is where kids share similar levels or traits. Children can be grouped by ability or by cooperative learning. When grouped by ability, within-class groups are very effective but heterogeneous ability grouping does not promote achievement for high achieving individuals, and therefore is good for those who are low achieving. There is also between-class ability grouping, and in both of these methods, high achieving children tend to do better. In cooperative learning, there must be five things: positive interdependence, individual and group accountability, interpersonal skills, face to face interaction, and group processing. This method also helps with self-esteem and motivation.  What is most beneficial in grouping of children who are intellectually or learning disabled?


Vygotsky believes that no learning is individual, and therefore thinks that learning is a social process. This makes Vygotsky a supporting of grouping, as children get to interact with others to expand their learning. Vygotsky would recommend heterogeneous learning, because he believes that you learn more when you learn from a wide variety of people.


Vygotsky believes that learning drives development, and development can occur throughout life until death. Piaget, however, believed that learning was always occurring, but development only happens in a certain stage of life.

I am being influenced by advertisements, brands, and other objects that may connect to something greater than itself. Additionally, all I have learned before (from others) has influenced by prior knowledge, perceptions and opinions I have today (and constantly think about).


2 comments:

  1. Good question! Do you think children who may have learning or intellectual disabilities would benefit more in a group setting? I do. Their peers would be able to scaffold them through lessons they may have trouble understanding. I suppose the grouping that would be most beneficial would be dependent on if the group was the least restrictive environment for that student. Thanks for the question! I was interested in thinking about that, too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great question. My honest opinion is that partial inclusion in classrooms is a good idea. For social interaction and some group work, students with special needs should be in heterogeneous groups. For other parts of the day, students with special needs should be in a classrooms with all special needs students in order to most effectively learn.

    ReplyDelete