The first little boy in the clip was in
the concrete operational stage, while the second child was in the formal
operational stage. The first child could not think abstractly and listen to the
rules that were given. The researcher told the boy that the feather would break
the glass, and the little boy knew it was not possible no matter how she stated
it. The older child understood the question asked, and knew how to answer the
question correctly, that the feather would break the glass. The little boy
would understand more direct examples to make connections, while the older girl
can understand “outside the box” thinking and can challenge her to be more
abstract.
Be careful in saying the second child could 'understand' the question properly. I'm sure the first child 'understood' the question--he believed he answered it absolutely reasonably.
ReplyDeleteWhat evidence is there that the child was thinking in a concrete way?
I like your suggestions for instruction--remember that you can't push them past their stage--this looks good.