I would tell a practicing teacher to think of ways that students would think about information and try to relate it to them as much as possible and assure them that if they are having difficulties others students most likely ave the same problems that they do. Also, having class discussions would allow for more critical thinking.
One question I had about the chapter was how would Piaget relate to this? He based everything off of students being in different stages of development and this is where their learning happened, so would he say that previous knowledge has nothing to do with this? Also, critical thinking can happen with any age students so would he say young students are not developmentally ready for this type of thinking?
Higher order type of thinking has to do more with self evaluation. You are able to understand why you got something wrong and how to correct it. You are also able to connect new information with previous knowledge and form new connections based on what you already know to be true and false. Lower order thinking is just being able to learn the information at hand and not connecting it to anything else.
The reading connects with what I know about development because I think that as we get older we are able to think about things more critically and evaluate the ways that we learn best. I think it is important for us to understand our own learning so that we can be successful. Development and learning are constantly happening and I think that being able to grow and make connections with previous topics and analyze them illustrates a lot of critical thinking and metacognition.
In my future teaching I could incorporate critical thinking by presenting information to students and having them think about what it means and then having a class discussion. For instance if we were reading and we needed to understand the reading, students would have different ideas of what the reading meant, so by having class discussions we are able to analyze the information and think about the deeper meaning of it.
Piaget would say that students at different stages can critically think at different levels. Also as the students go through the stages they are better able to grasp and evaluate themselves using metacognition.
ReplyDeleteCritical thinking would definitely look different at different ages, but the way we've defined critical thinking, I think it could definitely happen at lower stages, if it's just comparing information or 'problem solving' after disequilibrium.
ReplyDeleteMetacognition is a bit different. Even other psychological research shows that kids below about 3 or 4 cannot think about their own or others' thinking. We watched a video in class showing the false belief task, and that had nothing to do with Piaget (though it's consistent with his theory). It appears to require some biological maturation. However, after children are capable of it, it doesn't spontaneously happen. It definitely needs to be taught, modeled, and practiced, or it won't happen.